Відео

My math teacher asked the same question to the class and ultimately answered it himself with: because everytime someone divides by zero, a cute little wombat dies

Also divide operator is how many times number b goes into number a. Seeing as any multiple of 0 is 0 it is impossible for any multiplication of zero to return 1

This is like the immovable object meeting the irresistible force!

Jack Hallow ?

undivined

Should be called: negative and positive infinity. Just as the solution for x^2 = 4 is -2 and +2

Well. If graf is non Euclidean, it is possible.

White Terrance Howard 😂

Now I get it. But it's way, way, way too late.

0, It is absurd to be elevated to power also!

Terrace howard says 1x1=2 so . . . 😂

I give you Raj, the period of time when India was under British rule.

Bruh why u so idiot its just simple math. Lets say X/0=Y by math logic and rules. X should be X=Y*0, so there dorsnt exist a diff number so a number can be multiplied by zero, bcz we know 0*Y=0 and not X. Dont be dumb. Be smart

but then, would it not still be true? it could have every string in it even if its in its binary form no?

Science fiction should use this as a explanation of worm holes.. like a black hole (negative infinity) and the big bang (positive infinity) being the same thing

Now I am convinced

3b1b watcher here

Tism

Damn nerd.... 🤓

Did someone say pie? 🥔🎹

This proves the existence of God. The one who is above all and beyond everything ✨️

I Guess an important question is "is Zero a real number or a natural number?". If the latter then dividing a real number with a natural number has to have a natural answer. Hence the result should be (positive) infinite. This could question our understanding of Zero and natural numbers. Is Zero really a real number (just by reading this it males no sense)? 😢😮

Someone call Terrance howard😂😂😂😂

Soooo, 🤔🤔🤔x mmm 🤔 🥧is ♾

Try explaining for 1/x² , Mr fake maths professor 😂 spreading wrong knowledge 😂

wearing coat doesn't make you a professor in Maths. What you are talking about is in Limiting terms, the limit doesn't exist. But the value is still not defined. you can take 1/x², there limit exists at x=0, which is infinity, but the value at x=0 still not defined.😂 Learn some maths before posting false information Mr Fake mathematics professor

Thanks, always interested in insights into the infinite.

X÷0=±∞?

Am I stupid or should it just be one? Because it hasn’t been divided by anything?

I got it right! Plus or minus i.

1/0 is purple

The cactus is color red

Is that kiwi 🥝

I learned math and I not annoyed. Nice.

Chuck Norris divides by zero.

Wow that’s insane thank you so much

Quit it

The egg

I always wondered why people explain this phenomenon in this way. As I know and understand, it is just because this is how real numbers are defined (axioms). You only need to understand a few concepts: 1. Axioms 2. Sums and multiplications 3. The meaning of 0 4. Inverse of sum and inverse of multiplication 1. Axioms are like the default configuration to start working on top of that knowledge. Real number axioms are basically an abstraction of the real world. For example, if you have $1 at the beginning of the month and $4 on the last day of the month, at the end of the month you would have $5. It is the same if you interchange the amounts in this example. Maybe it is not the same in terms of liquidity, but it would be in terms of simplicity. So now we understand this, we proceed with the next concepts. 2.1. Sum is the process of updating the value of a set. Do you remember when in elementary school they told you that you are not allowed to sum apples and oranges? This is true if you are summing (updating) the value of each set independently, but if the set you are updating is the set of fruits, of course, you are allowed to do it. 2.2. Multiplication is updating the value of the set iteratively k times. In other terms, if you have the number (3*5), you are saying that you would update your set value (the set that you prefer, let’s choose apples). So if the current value is 3, you are saying that you would add iteratively another 3+3+3+3 values to the current value, in this case, it would be 3+15. At this point, you wonder why we add four times 3 instead of just adding five times 3. As mathematicians, you are not allowed to use any knowledge that you actually don’t know, and at this moment of the explanation, we haven't introduced zero yet. 3. Zero, in terms of the explanation, is actually the initial value of the set. To assign real numbers to a set, the set must exist, and even more, it needs to have the capacity to store a value. So following the whole explanation, to start counting apples, we should be sure that the apple exists. The existence of the apple doesn't mean we already have one; it means we can count it. In other words, we can update the value of the set. So returning to the last example, if we have the number (3*5), it means that as far as we know, the set exists, and even more, the value of the set can be updated. So we start with the current value 0, and we proceed to update the value iteratively five times with the amount of 3, so now we have 0+3+3+3+3+3=15. If you get to this point in the explanation, I’m glad to tell you that your curiosity and determination would be rewarded. 4.1. The inverse of a sum is the number that, when added to another one, the final result would be zero. This number can be identified because it starts with the "-" symbol. So if you have the number, for example, -4, you are asking for the number that, when added to 4, would return 0. So 4+(-4)=0. One more thing, this is the reason why if you ask for -(-4)=4, you can think about it as asking for the number that, when added to -4, returns 0. So we have -4+4=0. We can observe that we end with the same result but in a different order. 4.2. The inverse of a multiplication is similar to the inverse of a sum, but in this case, we are asking for the number that, when multiplied by another number, the final result would be 1. You can identify this because it ends with the (^-1) symbol. As a convention, we also identify this with the following notation (1/k), where k is the number we are asking for. For example, 5*(5^-1)=5(1/5)=1/5+1/5+1/5+1/5+1/5=1. So now we have all the ingredients to explain why (0^-1) is not defined. The reason is that you are asking for the number that, when multiplied by 0, would return 1 as the final result. As we explained, if we have, for example, (0*6), we need to update the current value of 0 by adding 6 times 0, so at the end, we would end with a result of 0. You can choose any real number that you prefer and the result would always be 0. So this leads us to another axiom: any number multiplied by 0 would have a final result of 0. So returning to our example, if we have (0^-1), we are asking for a number that, when multiplied by 0, the final result would be 1, but as we see, any number multiplied by 0 would result in 0. This is a direct consequence of the last axiom. Now we know why 0^-1 returns an error and why some people say that 0^-1 is not defined.

A number divided by cero gives the same number as result. 1/0= 1 5000/0=5000 On the other hand x/0= undefined, could be any number.

The first one is true in fake math 😂

Great video!

If Jack Harlow and Lil Dicky did the Fusion dance, I'm pretty sure it would look and sound like this. 😂😂😂😂

so, its zero

But then you learn that positive infinity and negative infinity are the defined as the same point of the point at infinity. In some some weird folding space plain, and you question existence again.

Did Sicherman die?

Undefined is good, thanks.

So, if the +infinity and -infinity equals eachother out, then it is 0. Simple. Let's call it 0infinity, makes it sound cooler and more scientific. 😂

Yep! He's definitely single 😶

Pi ain't a number. It's a desserts